The third instalment in our lending gender bias series is ready for you. This series continues to explore the reasons for the lack of funding available to female led business.
Approximately six months ago we launched our first video (below) in the lending gender bias series, dedicated to the Alison Rose Review, a report highlighting the discrepancy in funding received by female companies compared to male counterparts. We noted the barriers to female entrepreneurs achieving greater levels of funding, but also highlighted the opportunities identified in the report and the societal and economic benefits that would come from increasing the volume of female-led businesses in the UK.
Since then, I was fortunate enough to interview Sam Seaton, the Founder and CEO of MoneyHub (below). It was really interesting to hear her views on the report and the market generally, as well as to hear about her experience of trying to get funding as the female of a FinTech.
Over the past six months, the issue of gender parity in funding has continued to be discussed and there does appear to have been positive change in the market: in January this year, under the leadership of Alison Rose, RBS launched £1bn of funding specifically for female entrepreneurs. Their aspiration is to create at least 50,000 new businesses by 2023. In March of this year, Goldman Sachs reported that their Launch with GS initiative has deployed over $230mn of funds globally to businesses with diverse leadership since inception in June 2018. This initiative is also open to US-based Black and Latinx founders which is brilliant to see, as it is not only female-led businesses that are under-represented in this area.
More examples of positive change can be found in the third video of our lending gender bias series. Here I interview Julia Rabin of Diversity VC and Claire Palmer of Silicon Valley Bank’s Emerging Venture Capital Practice. Our discussion focuses on the make-up of VC firms and what impact this may have on the ways in which they invest. We also consider the importance of inclusivity to create and foster a diverse culture within the venture capital firms themselves as well as in the companies they invest in.
Below is the whole Lending Gender Bias series, including shortened highlight versions of Parts 2 and 3, as well as links to the full length recordings for those who want to hear the conversations in full. I hope you enjoy!
Part 3: The role of Venture Capital (with Julia Rabin and Claire Palmer):
The full Part 3 interview is available here
Part 1: The Alison Rose Review:
Part 2: Working with Entrepreneurs (with Sam Seaton):
The full Part 2 interview is available here
Note that these videos were recorded prior to social distancing measures being in place.
UK payments outlook: the five trends to look out for
We explore the five key trends and predictions we expect to see in the payments industry over the next 12 months.Read more
The role of regulators in accelerating Web 3 innovation
Financial institutions are seeing the potential that Web 3 technologies can offer but need the regulatory guard rails to have the confidence to commit.Read more
TNFD: Are you prepared for biodiversity reporting?
With the new TNFD draft disclosure metrics, we look at what nature-related information banks have included in their 2022 reporting.Read more
What can banks learn from the 2022 climate disclosures?
As the 2022 climate reporting cycle gets underway for the UK banks, Baringa has performed a benchmarking exercise and extracted the key themes and insights that are appearing.Read more