Historically, migration programmes within energy retailers have focused too heavily on just delivering the technology infrastructure. More recently, organisations in transition have rightly put greater focus on customer outcomes and new agile ways of working.
Whilst these are important goals, energy retailers should not pursue these in isolation - core commercial outcomes and operational governance are also critical to successful migrations and embedding new operating models and ways of working.
The migration to new Software as a Service (SaaS) platforms and adaptation of business operating models has enabled greater agility and flexibility - resulting in significant benefits such as reduced IT costs, increasing speed in launching new products/services, and reduced operational cost to serve. However, energy retailers must ensure that these gains are not achieved at the expense of customer, commercial and regulatory outcomes.
The complexity of customer relationship management in the energy industry along with recent market volatility has exposed challenges in these new SaaS platforms and operating models. Some of these ‘new breed’ technology platforms were originally designed primarily for simple, online, direct debit customers with little consideration given to more complex customer needs.
However, with customer debt levels rising, billing inaccuracies are being uncovered, and service levels are declining as a result of increased customer demand. Under historical market conditions these deficiencies may not have been exposed but are very clear during the Cost of Living Crisis. Servicing these complex customers creates challenges which requires a high level of service and system maturity to be maintained throughout the migration.
Maximising value through migration
To succeed in their migration, retailers must create end-to-end delivery plans which cover both the “standard” customers and the final complex ‘tail’ of the migration - which may include complex metering or customers with ‘in-flight’ processes such as late-stage debt collection. For a successful migration, retailers should balance the need to exit legacy systems as fast of possible while avoiding losing commercial value.
Throughout migration, energy retailers need to be continually refreshing their view on the value of their customer accounts and which journeys they are in, to avoid being caught out midway through the transition. Companies need to be considering the needs of internal, external stakeholders and customers so that the future operating model is set up for success, both operationally and commercially.
Energy retailers need to decide what criteria they will set that will allow their customers to migrate to their new platform whilst avoiding re-creating legacy problems. Simultaneously, retailers need to decide when certain legacy processes will end, for example when to retire debt journeys on their old systems to avoid duplication on the new platform.
These challenges represent both short term migration and long-term capability questions. Failure to consider both the long and short term can result in either a new organisation not being set up for success or a failed migration.
Ofgem, who are expanding their enforcement team, are well versed at identifying retailers who are not meeting the required service levels. Historically, Ofgem has imposed a £26m fine for a failed migration and there are three open actions against retailers who are not delivering on operational and customer outcomes, demonstrating that these are key considerations for migrating retailers.
Building and embedding commercial resilience in the new operation
To avoid these key challenges in a system migration, energy retailers need to keep their customer, regulatory and commercial obligations in mind. Retailers' customer bases are too large and too vulnerable to fall into the trap of a “start-up” culture mindset. Moving fast and breaking things will result in retailers lacking the capability to deal with their license obligations.
Having the right capabilities, such as a segmented set of debt journeys and regulatory reporting, in place at day one is essential to prevent problems from compounding rapidly. Failure to tackle these issues will result in retailers being stuck in constant firefighting mode as they migrate, jeopardising the expected financial and customer benefits, and undermining the company’s targeted operational structures.
Baringa has supported several energy retailers through this transition and are well equipped to advise on the potential pitfalls and challenges that retailers will face. For help with this or other related topics on migration and transition please contact Toby Thurgood and Sarah Smith.
Related Insights
How ‘Equipment-as-a-Service’ models unlock commercial decarbonisation
Read our latest piece, created in collaboration with Tallarna, to explore the components of an ‘Equipment-as-a-Service’ model, how they can be deployed, and how to increase take-up.
Read moreThe role of the state in the GB energy market
What is the state’s role in the GB energy sector and how could it be extended to support decarbonisation objectives?
Read moreData-driven decarbonisation: how analytics and AI are supporting the energy transition
Data and AI are key to enabling mass-market decarbonisation. From standardisation to sharing, everyone has a role in ensuring their approach delivers industry-wide benefits alongside individual competitive advantages.
Read moreDelivery options for new nuclear power in Sweden
Read our study on financing and delivery models for new nuclear power, carried out for the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise providing key recommendations.
Read more